
The chair of the Covid inquiry has dominated that proof associated to PPE Medpro, the agency linked to Baroness Michelle Mone and her husband Doug Barrowman, will probably be heard in a closed, non-public session subsequent month.
On 3 March, the inquiry will start 4 weeks of hearings into choices to purchase Private Protecting Gear (PPE) throughout the pandemic.
Baroness Hallett mentioned she was imposing the restriction as she was glad there was a threat of prejudice to felony proceedings if “delicate proof” was heard in public.
Victims’ teams and media shops, together with the NEWSTORN, had argued the hazards had been overstated, given the early stage of the police investigation and the fabric already within the public area.
Witness proof
The Nationwide Crime Company (NCA) opened an investigation into PPE Medpro in Could 2021 into suspected felony offences dedicated within the procurement of PPE.
The corporate was awarded authorities contracts value greater than £200m after Baroness Mone really useful the agency to ministers throughout the Covid pandemic.
Baroness Mone, 52, and Mr Barrowman, 59, have denied wrongdoing.
In June 2024, the NCA mentioned an unnamed 46-year-old man from Barnet, north London, had been arrested as a part of its investigation.
Thus far, no felony expenses have been introduced and the Crown Prosecution Service has not been formally instructed by the NCA.
On 9 December 2024, the Covid inquiry mentioned it had acquired an software from the NCA for a restriction order, claiming there was a threat of hurt to its investigation if delicate proof about PPE Medpro was heard in public.
The NCA initially needed to stop the inquiry listening to any proof concerning the firm, saying “different contracts might be chosen”.
It then requested for 26 witness statements written by its employees to be withheld, and an order to be made stopping sure questions concerning the agency to be requested within the inquiry room in a public session.
It argued these restrictions ought to embrace the identification of any particular person beneath investigation; proof referring to the opinion of any authorities official regarding PPE Medpro’s contracts; and proof about funds to the corporate and who finally benefited.
In its submission, it mentioned there was a “practical risk that felony expenses towards a number of people will circulation from the investigation”.
The Division of Well being later requested for the phrases of any restriction order to be widened to incorporate any “monetary materials and correspondence” referring to the acquisition of PPE from the corporate, though that request has been rejected by the inquiry.

In her closing ruling, Baroness Hallett mentioned it was each “vital and proportionate” for the Covid inquiry to look at contracts between the federal government and PPE Medpro.
However she did settle for there was a threat of harm to any future felony proceedings if she allowed all of the proof to be heard in public.
Because of this, any delicate proof concerning the firm will probably be heard in a non-public, closed listening to, anticipated to be held in late March.
She mentioned the NCA’s authentic software, which additionally sought to have members of the press and different organisations excluded from these closed classes, went “additional than vital” and was “too broad an method”.
Representatives of 5 media organisations will probably be invited to attend however will be unable to report on the proceedings till the conclusion of any felony case, together with doable appeals.
Baroness Hallett mentioned that call was consistent with earlier public inquiries, together with the investigation into the Novichok poisoning in Salisbury.
A spokesman for the NCA mentioned its investigation into PPE Medpro “stays a precedence”.
“In such circumstances it may possibly take appreciable time to make sure that an intensive, unbiased and goal investigation is carried out,” he added.